Moleskine’s “What’s in your bag!” is now on FLICKR

34539_455308787048_132777712048_5905521_222419_n copy

After the success of Moleskine's "What's In Your Bag?" on Facebook, there's now a FLICKR group to accommodate those who wish to share the colorful and oftentimes curious flotsam and jetsam within their purses. 


(Shown above: janina's photo)

Print it in Moleskine MSK format
This entry was posted in Announcement from Moleskine. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Moleskine’s “What’s in your bag!” is now on FLICKR

  1. Harry Dean says:

    They forgot the gross stuff that’s at the bottom of most people’s bags.

  2. name says:

    There’s a “What’s in your bag” group on Flickr that’s been around for years and has 10,000 members, if not many more. What’s the difference between that group and this one?

  3. John says:

    “Name” brings up a good point. There are groups like this that have been around a lot longer and have thousands of members. But I think a better question is, do we need either of them?

  4. Andrea says:

    We decided to create a brand new group for two reasons basically. First one is because we wanted to highlight those bag photos with a Moleskine in it, and second reason is because we would like to give continuity to the contest we held in Hong Kong in May.
    A part from that, thanks a lot for your precious feedbacks!

  5. Ron says:

    “But I think a better question is, do we need either of them?”
    —> You could say that about anything – like uselessly negative comments.

  6. name says:

    John- True. Do we need either? Not really. The larger group has always been an interesting voyeurism into people’s crap.

    Ron- I would say that your comment is the most useless here.

  7. Ron says:

    Thanks, Name. Negativity is so much fun!

  8. name says:

    So is being a needless douche, Ron. Oh, wait, did I call the kettle black? My bad.

  9. Ron says:

    Wow, name calling. I tip my hat to you, Sir.
    It is amusing how I commented that “this is stupid that you posted this on your blog” comments were as useless as what you thought didn’t belong on Flickr and that you keep proving me right by lashing out at me with a fake “name.”
    But, to clarify:
    Am I a needless douche in that I don’t need to exist? (Am I actually a douche? And one that does not need to exist?)
    Was I needlessly being like a douche without needing to be like a douche?
    or (the better question)
    Is it just douche-like to leave “I think this is stupid/useless” comments on people’s blogs anonymously?

  10. comment says:


    And Ron the troll returns with their multiple names.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

I accept Privacy policy and Terms of use